How To Install License Plate Honda

your lawyer - an unknown being?

let's assume you required in 2005/2006 a lawyer, but not just any but a specialist lawyer with special abilities, so you would be amazed at the search engine of the Stuttgart Chamber of Lawyers to be've found to ensure that there is a lawyer, combines the following capabilities to be , for on the search engine of the RAK Stuttgart was found the following:

lawyer as

areas of law (Germany): Health law, company law, social law and pension law, tax law, traffic law.
areas of law (International): France, United Kingdom, United States.
languages: English, French.

If you read this entry and what are essentially a recommendation by the Stuttgart Chamber of Lawyers in mind should you have imagined but secretly, that we are dealing here with an absolute "cannon" of German law and anyone who is now in such as a lawyer the listed jurisdictions studied, nothing could have found better than this lawyer.
Far from it.
why this entry was tolerated by the Bar Association Stuttgart there is still a mystery to me, because after I record this on 15 had claimed February 2006 letter to the Bar of Stuttgart, was the entry into perspective very quickly and it was only the entry that it is Mrs. B. is a lawyer. The rest had disappeared without comment.
But it gets even better. Towards the lawyer Mrs. B. on 12 January 2005 by the Stuttgart Chamber of Lawyers, the revocation of its authorization has been.
The reasons which one led to this withdrawal also to make waterproof were very serious. However, their clients knew at that time nothing of what was accused as the lawyer.
On the contrary, as their clients made their strong for them and I even wrote a heroic letter to the Bar Association in Stuttgart, where I was charged to the letter from behind the bar association of heavy and I in return, the lawyer B. was still ridiculed bad after I "and thanks to the efforts" of her colleagues at the shelter p. landed and was eliminated by the Volksbank Göppingen. Not to mention the 100 days in prison, which I for insulting the chief clerk of the Volksbank Göppingen X. should have to settle.
Neither the lawyer as, nor her colleague, lawyer S., who took over after the revocation of its authorization my mandate were able or willing to represent me accordingly.
to stay But my words are not empty words, and after I over all the documents I have ever received, I shall publish them accordingly.
I've had enough now final because it can not be that I must punish me leave, although I, except that I had a boundless faith in two lawyers to come owe me nothing left.
As for the punishment of the district court in Geislingen concerns so I will take the evidence that has been done here in any way on the merits investigation, but that it would only make myself gag. It is an outrage in what way this act the government bodies and although obviously very subjective, to conceal certain things and emphasize certain things, which will be presented entirely reasonable upside.
That I neither the prosecutor's office in Ulm, nor the District Court in Ulm, nor the district court in Geislingen have a lobby, after I adopted from the start the hand in some wounds, I am well aware. But unlike many other people I do not need a lobby, but required a proper public behavior and mainly by people who have to watch over this law.
But this is a huge swamp and when you try to exceed this, you will inevitably sink and keep for all time while at the mouth. This upper
lawyers are not stupid, and as people tend also to comfort, you just go the path of least resistance. And this path leads straight as an arrow just to the interests of the common man over.
But no matter what happens and whatever they think justice still so everything can be, I'm fighting for my my constitutionally guaranteed right. A lawyer is not the right but he has to make sure that it is respected. And that's what I demand.
The specific facts are before the appropriate state authorities, but will act very contrary. Whatever.
A senior public prosecutor and that none other than Dr. swabs from the prosecutor's office in Ulm refused my request several times after a personal interview. Why? Quite simply because he otherwise the baseless accusations against me could not keep up, because there is a huge difference is in a personal conversation with certain transactions or deal in writing to argue, while the arguments of others simply not worthy. It is then not respond well to corrections. The litigant is running on empty and finally gives up in frustration. This is not correct, but very effective.
No one is willing to conduct a personal interview, for which the Volksbank Göppingen is again a prime example. But enough of the preliminaries
, for such commonly held words go unheard. Only if you present certain persons from certain institutions, with their own works to the public, it might show a corresponding effect.
out personal rights, personal rights here, so the should not go so far that people are not in public should measure their actions. I can but usually assume that an official or otherwise in the public standing of telling me something, even in full behind it. If so, we must also be allowed to quote him. Can we not, then something is wrong.
prime example is again the Volksbank Göppingen. There must be according to the resolution of the LG Ulm, not even the board members quoted by name, without risking punished with an amount of up to 250,000 EUR to be. Even the the lawyer who represented the People's Bank Göppingen may not be referenced by name. The judge at the district court Ulm Schulte, which has Sun
This in turn means that the Volksbank Göppingen can do whatever she wants and the one who dares to criticize, is summarily silenced. This works well with this judiciary.

From lawyer to the lawyers.
Here is the letter regarding the RAK Stuttgart recruited by the lawyer as the beginning of 2006 with the above entry in the search engine of the attorney RAK Stuttgart. I am the way, no entry has carved known in which a single attorney so the plaster.

(TO ENLARGE THE DOCUMENTS INS DOCUMENT PLEASE CLICK)

If now the letter of the Bar in Stuttgart.

This letter may only be viewed only as a preface and you will wonder what is in the right state so anything is possible.

particularly the role of bar associations, I am not quite clear, and even the Justice Department no clearly defined role. It's all very strange.

continued fast!

How To Make It Not Awkward With The Guy You Like

2008 - The year has started and will certainly be very eventful

NewsLetter
01/2008 of 2 January 2008

Ladies and Gentlemen,

to my first newsletter in 2008, may I welcome you cordially and wish you also give the very best wishes for the new year under way, and I put health at the first place would, as health is the highest good times now and no one knows this better than that who was seriously ill or ever it is right now.
would like to the second point of my wishes, I put the inner satisfaction. Inner contentment has nothing to do with financial prosperity, because you can be poor but happy.
wish Of course, I also all human wealth and financial independence, because this in turn creates room for maneuver in (almost) all circumstances, because with money you can in this our country now (almost) everything, except, for example, health and inner satisfaction.

After I had the year with some people and that close contact with persons who are also not a bed of roses and she told me her Concerns and needs entrusted, I have been encouraged in any case in my activities continue as usual and continue to injustices in our society to point, which of course in turn can be built only on my fate and the fate of my family, because everyone knows about the problems the concerns and needs most likely know when it comes to your own will and therefore I would ask everyone the question of when because the opportunity to do so cautiously to go public and then spread the grievances of his person or family, because only then you can tell where the dog is really buried and the only way there can be an appropriate response from the public, leave because with astonishment I present today yet been determined, that there are people who believe that they spoon-fed from an official need and then are somewhat surprised when they finally received a statement that the officer as a civil servant for the concerns and needs of the citizen has to be there and must not bear the citizens to the whims of officials. And I must unfortunately also find that for many people the "authorities fear" so deeply inserted into the bone that they are literally panic when they have time to visit an office. Since
taken extra holiday, as you go to the pub beforehand and that you can not bathe or shower without first office again is beyond question. Then, even the best clothes from the closet and got one is ready for "serious" way to the office to be such as to extend the identity card.
It's terrible when you see how a normally responsible citizen, a complete Kasper is made. What is lacking in education, with of course lead to an anxious public and much easier to manipulate as a mature, familiar with its rights citizen. Thus may be assumed that the prevailing situation is not accidentally.
The same is also true when dealing with banks, with the visits there often even more terrifying than for the officials, because the bankers there is also an almost indescribable arrogance that have any self confidence immediately is crushed and one should have to deal effectively with a friendly and courteous Banker, ring any alarm bells, because it is about trust advertised, with the best of man is asked, namely money. Therefore, never forget if you visit a banker: Never trust a banker and never go alone to talk with a banker. Each call log and countersign the banker can be. This can save a lot of money and trouble, as many bankers have very short memories and the knowledge often only hours later not what was said or specify the content of the conversation again in a completely different context.
What do you do then? Your word against the word of the Bankers. Since you have no chance for even a called court will provide for lack of evidence against you always. Of that I can sing a little song and I want to save everyone in the same situation come to like my family and me. Although not every bank, Volksbank Göppingen and not every banker has memory problems, but I can only advise all to be nothing left to chance and control is better than unconditional trust.
The absolute shock to me was that we do not yet one can trust their own lawyers. My first meeting with a lawyer was and then I was by law the Federal Republic of Germany still convinced he was the saying of himself, "be right and get right is a very big difference," Why do I need an attorney of law? In the end, he decides to judge what is right and wrong and there is no man can take the only objective decisions, including a judge not, there are again many criteria through which you have to vote a judge gracious and you may be their right to help because he will decide subjective in any case and if it does not fit your face or your appearance, you have lost. And as Judge of all doubts are raised, for they are nothing but their conscience, decisions are often made accordingly, that if a judge with a conscience actually exists and if so, what it is like, is unfortunately not be measured.
And if a lawyer has made it to the judges crowd because he was named to the proposal from either party, it is automatically equal to God is omniscient-righteous, without exception, objective and above all, he is there for life.
a nonsense as it can not be larger. Even if a judge during his term of office loses his mental capacity and "strange" decisions is, this is the judicial independence covered. After all, who wants to or who can criticize him? Or who relieves him of his duties? What if a judge is suffering from dementia? When that falls on and when will react? A judge is first and foremost a human and transitory nature and is not immediately better and no worse than any other human being. This should be considered and therefore there is no question that a judge would be temporary. "All power emanates from the people", including the choice of people to a judge. And each of the German law takes seriously support this and even the judges themselves should, because they know best what quality their decisions in part. And if
a judge, as a specific criminal judge of the district court in an objective manner Geislingen website dubbed as an insulting side, it is clear that resonate in such sayings emotions, which exclude completely objective decisions.
The term abuse page recognizes something down and you do not bother to explain why. A judge? No man! With all the weaknesses and feelings of a human being and subjective to the hair tips. The website
www.existenzvernichter.de , just this side has been dubbed, among other things by the Chief Prosecutor of the Prosecutor Mengele Ulm as an insulting site is temporarily down updated, especially since this domain is not even in my possession and the owner will be created no difficulties.
I will for my part of the two blogs

http://exvn.blogspot.com and http://xybank.blogspot.com

use and always inferior to my posts with original documents, what confusion and speculation not only raises.
Unfortunately, I have the original documents partially censor what I am reluctant though, because each individual should be measured by his deeds, but I'll add where it must be the "personal rights".
For my family and I will again give tough year, because I am convinced that you will attack me sick again, the beginning is already made, for the Lord criminal judge Wenger and the prosecution Ulm me want to re-lock away items for 100 days, because I appear to the two lawyers Regina Bornstein and Mr. Thomas Saschenbrecker "bad nachgeredet" have.
Then it will be interesting what can occur to the Volksbank Göppingen still and finally also the separation to take place with my wife.
All in all a busy year, and always with the hope in mind that the truth with a spectacular victory.

In this sense, and again with the best wishes

Hans Hermann