Hans Hermann, 73312 Geislingen ad platforms
http://www.existenzvernichter.de/ xybank.blogspot.com exvn.blogspot.com
Ladies verschlägt and gentlemen,
now and then it even I have the language when I read the highly intellectual effusions of a criminal court judge must manifestly do not even like he do need to cheer for an innocent person a debt to me at last, and by all means silence to be able to. What drives this man so everything has to do with judicial independence at all any more. For me this is nothing as abuse of office and broke the law, because this would have self-satisfied Mr. Richter took the trouble to research it properly he would have noticed very quickly that this letter addressed to the bar associations have purely stylistically at all can not come from me.
After the meantime several people already interested in the content of the summary punishment, including people who know the two lawyers also good, I've decided to publish the summary punishment. Other hand, will certainly be no objection, after all, it is my personal decision, whom I bring the letter addressed to me for information. The two lawyers who criminal charges that have encouraged by their punishment, have no objection that they must necessarily be appointed.
the Criminal Judge Wenger is guilty, that he has ever made any effort to identify, because otherwise he would know that his punishment is without any foundation. I also think it is weak, that a judge has needed to incorporate into a polemic with punishment, if only because the term "abuse-site" concept is a completely unserious and to seek a punishment usually has nothing. First, this website is not even mentioned in my possession, what this judge in clean investigation should know. In addition, although the facts and provable facts are never described as disgraceful. This is about pure propaganda, as even the Lord Chief Prosecutor Mengele has this notion of abuse side some time ago also abused in an improper manner.
I just wonder again what sort of Super Lawyers this is to take the obviously very emotional and subjective decisions, instead of deciding objectively legally and properly. You can be really shocked about these judicial only, for these judicial drifts dangerous.
What has surprised me is the very fact that the criminal judge Mr Wenger this punishment still has not even signed, but only a stamp of Mr Wenger adorns this punishment. Thus, even the cleaning lady could have created the District Court in Geislingen this punishment. To my knowledge such copies must be signed by the judge himself. Or not? To me, it all remains rather strange.
is exactly how strange it seems to me that a complaint against a lawyer, regardless of who originates that function may be used against the act adversely to move here then a penal behind. Where is the right of appeal? The complaint was submitted solely at the bar associations in Stuttgart and Karlsruhe, and at the Federal Bar Association in Berlin and privately made. Rather than refute these allegations now, these two lawyers to report to the prosecutor to pursue criminal charges and even. There is something not at all.
Now that I have opposed this form of punishment within the time prescribed, must now follow a court case, these two attorneys have to act as witnesses. Then we'll see.
The appendix now so the punishment.
Sincerely
Hans Hermann
Appendix:
punishment Bo Sat Page1, Page2 Sat punishment Bo, Bo punishment Sat Page3, Page4 Sat punishment Bo, Bo punishment Sat Page5, Page6 punishment Bo Sat
is published on exvn.blogspot.com
